Caveat: While I enjoy the company of many Boomers individually, I'm an Xer and, accordingly, have very little tolerance for them as a group. You're welcome to send me comments pointing out how little tolerance I have for Boomers, but I'm already aware and okay with it.
I was born right in the middle of Generation X (1968), so I turned 40 last year, right on time. Overall, it was a positive experience. With Boomers as our role models on aging, and their refusal to age, 40 is pretty much everything it's cracked up to be and more.
But things aren't all roses on the other side of 40. Oh no. See, Xers should be moving into the leadership phase of adulthood, having completed the activity phase. We've married (some of us have had the time and energy to do it more than once already), had children, established careers, and we're now ready to steer the ship.
And we should be steering the ship. Because we're done loading the ship. The Millennials are now the "It" generation (in a good "it girl" kind of way; we used to be the "It" generation but in more of a "gotcha, you're it" kind of way). They've splashed on the scene, made a big impact what with the electing of the President and all. Public service is cool again, thanks to them. In my opinion as Someone Who Pays Attention to These Things, the Millennial generation is everything we were promised and more (which chaps the hide of Boomers no end, for some reason; obviously this just makes me love the Millennials even more). So even if we weren't ready to steer the ship, there's no more room on the loading team, so we might as well steer. Right?
No. About that, you would be dead wrong. We *can't* steer the way the previous three generations were allowed to steer. Why? Because the frickin' Boomers aren't done leading. My entire life has been filled with doomsday messages about the fact that Boomers are not going die out in quite the way they would need to not to bankrupt Social Security. Okay, fine. I'm not just dying for them to . . . well, die. But I would like them to *retire*. Otherwise, what are Xers to do? We can't be the leaders because the leaders won't move on to stewardship. We can't be the young whippersnappers anymore because someone else has taken that job. So once again we're just in limbo. Once latch-key kids, we're now latch-key adults. We're authorized to make ourself a sandwich and do our homework, but we're not allowed to use the phone or answer the door. I'm not saying we would steer the ship to greatness. Hell, we may just run the damn thing into the ground. But it's our turn to run it into the ground.
This is all exacerbated when you're an Xer in legal education. Already, people don't retire from legal education until it's 15 years past reasonable. And why would you? As my friend Christine Hurt has said, retirement is about setting your own hours, reading and writing about the things that interest you, and sharing your knowledge with the young people. That's our job description. So I understand that Boomers may not want to retire. But most law professors do at least have the decency to quit wanting to be all involved in things when they hit . . . I don't know . . . 65? And it grates all the more to know that many Boomers can't retire because their cohorts just ran the global economy into the ground right as they were on the verge of bankrupting Social Security.
Perhaps it's all for the best, though. Everyone's been afraid of what a world run by Xers would look like (myself included). It's starting to look like things will pass straight from the Boomers to the Millennials, so everyone may be spared that particular future shock.
Don't Sell Your Friends Up the Network River
19 hours ago
3 comments:
I hear you, Tracy. The Boomers seem to keep hanging on in just about every way possible. My wife and I were at Macy's the other day when I noticed a bunch of mannequins with hippie-inspired clothing (women's, not men's). I remembered the whole neo-hippie look being "in" about four or five years back. I asked my wife (who's a wardrobe and image consultant) whether it was coming back again. She said, "Oh, it never goes out of style." I said somewhat facetiously, "Well, not until the last Boomer kicks the bucket."
The good news is that plaid is back in style for men. I guess it can't be long before we have a neo-grunge fashion movement. Then, Xers will have truly arrived. ;)
Interesting blog and post. But it’s missing an important part of the equation: Generation Jones, born 1954-1965, between the Boomers and Generation X. Born in 1968, you are at the beginning, not the middle, of GenX.
Google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s gotten a ton of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. The Associated Press' annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.
It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. Many experts now believe it breaks down this way:
DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies: 1946-1964
Baby Boom GENERATION: 1942-1953
Generation Jones: 1954-1965
Generation X: 1966-1978
Here is an op-ed about GenJones as the new generation of leadership in USA TODAY:
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm
Here's a page with a good overview of recent stuff about GenJones:
http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html
Oh the irony of the "youth generation" who wanted to trust no one over 30 and now refuses to stop being "the man".
Cindy
Post a Comment